It was this time last year that Sam told us about the brand trade. So looks like this might have some ring of truth to it. Just as we thought everything was clear, this comes up
Actually, I think Smith nailed it one or two days before the trade. He definitely cautioned that Brand was on the block for the #1 or #2 pick. I dismissed it immediately but remember thinking later about how Smith had it right.Originally posted by bobalooey
sam Smith NEVER reported the Brand trade before it happened. Not one source knew about it or reported it before it happened. They didn't even know on ESPN until it was announced by the commisioner. So do not berlieve anything that SS reports. He is a complete idiot.
The way I remember it was Smith proposed that trading Brand might be the best approach for the Bulls to get better. That is different than reporting that such a trade is actually going to happen or is actually in the works.Originally posted by RealFan
Actually, I think Smith nailed it one or two days before the trade. He definitely cautioned that Brand was on the block for the #1 or #2 pick. I dismissed it immediately but remember thinking later about how Smith had it right.
Again, I don't claim to be a guy who remembers everything and I certainly don't like Sam Smith. But I think he mentioned in print that Brand would likely be traded for one of the top two picks. I don't know that he mentioned Chandler as the pick though.Originally posted by Kneepad
The way I remember it was Smith proposed that trading Brand might be the best approach for the Bulls to get better. That is different than reporting that such a trade is actually going to happen or is actually in the works.
I did as you said and you are correct. I wish that someone had simply pasted the article within the thread. But I agree with you that the article was speculation. Though I still wonder if his speculation wasn't "educated" by someone within the Bulls organization. I'm just being paranoid.Originally posted by Kneepad
Ah, but if you go to page 2 of that thread and look for air_philly_23's post, it claims that this was a trade suggestion by Smith, not reporting discussions of such a nature between the two teams. The fact that it ultimately came to pass nearly exactly as Smith suggested makes it seem more like it was "reported" as opposed to "suggested".
With all Krause's paranoia over secrecy, I simply can't believe that word of such a critical trade leaked out of the Bulls organization beforehand.