http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=fanball-knicksrumormillconti&prov=fanball&type=lgns
Why or why not?
Miles? Why or why not?
Wallace? Why or why not?
Why or why not?
Miles? Why or why not?
Wallace? Why or why not?
Want Keith van Horn?
1 - 20 of 27 Posts
Joined
·
640 Posts
While we are at it..
We should bring Back Brad Miller @ center, bring in Christian Laetnerr @ PF and also Brent Barry @ SG.
Trade all the 3C's, AD and Fizer ( There all bums right?)
We could have a starting line-up of.....
PG - K. Hinrich
SG - Brent Barry
SF - K. Van Horn
PF - C. Laetnerr
C - B. Miller
Wow, doesn't that make you want to run out and buy season tickets!
We should bring Back Brad Miller @ center, bring in Christian Laetnerr @ PF and also Brent Barry @ SG.
Trade all the 3C's, AD and Fizer ( There all bums right?)
We could have a starting line-up of.....
PG - K. Hinrich
SG - Brent Barry
SF - K. Van Horn
PF - C. Laetnerr
C - B. Miller
Wow, doesn't that make you want to run out and buy season tickets!
Joined
·
5,032 Posts
I sense a tinge of racism in this post. :yes:
Joined
·
5,032 Posts
Lakers could use a guy like Van Horn. We don't have much to trade, but maybe we could get rid of Fisher.
Joined
·
5,702 Posts
that "all-white" starting lineup would win more games than our current cast of characters. :sigh:
Joined
·
640 Posts
No racist connotations in what I posted.
I mean why would we bring in another player with no heart?
(Keith Van Horn)
Joined
·
8,438 Posts
Van Horny: No. Talented offensive player w/range, size, handle, and inside/outside game. A defensive liability at the 3. Does not deserve max contract, and I don't want to pay it for two more years after this year.
Wallace: Conflicted. Would like the flexibility to have a salary that large come off our books next year. It would be almost impossible to acquire him. We would have to trade Erob, Davis, and someone of a lot of value (probably Curry). In which case, I wouldn't do it. I don't really want anything to do with him, but his expiring contract is enticing.
Miles: Sure I'd take him. He's a very small risk. He has a small salary and his contract is expiring, and we would have his Bird rights. Unless Ronald Dupree keeps lighting it up for us, we still haven't found a long term answer there. I remain hopeful that he will be a good player down the road.
Wallace: Conflicted. Would like the flexibility to have a salary that large come off our books next year. It would be almost impossible to acquire him. We would have to trade Erob, Davis, and someone of a lot of value (probably Curry). In which case, I wouldn't do it. I don't really want anything to do with him, but his expiring contract is enticing.
Miles: Sure I'd take him. He's a very small risk. He has a small salary and his contract is expiring, and we would have his Bird rights. Unless Ronald Dupree keeps lighting it up for us, we still haven't found a long term answer there. I remain hopeful that he will be a good player down the road.
Joined
·
323 Posts
I agree, Van Horn is the kind of guy we could use. It opens up the opportunity for him to utilize his outside shot. But, his lack of defensive ability might keep him on the bench, especially with Skiles at the helm.
Miles, ugh! We don't need any more high schoolers with high potential that will probably never be reached.
Wallace I would not go for. Never liked him, never will. Might turn out to be a horrible influence on the three "C"s.
Miles, ugh! We don't need any more high schoolers with high potential that will probably never be reached.
Wallace I would not go for. Never liked him, never will. Might turn out to be a horrible influence on the three "C"s.
Joined
·
8,438 Posts
What does that have to do with all the other white players you suggested we have in our starting 5?
Joined
·
640 Posts
Look over the history of threads of posters on what players the Bulls should bring in here...
Anyway that's neither here no there, I was saying it in jest!
Nothing to be taken seriously. :angel:
Joined
·
1,975 Posts
Fizer for Miles... but that made too much sense for both teams.
Don't want Van Horn and only want Sheed if he never attends a game and it clears cap space for us, which means trade AD. But I really like AD. Too bad we can't restructure his contract.
Don't want Van Horn and only want Sheed if he never attends a game and it clears cap space for us, which means trade AD. But I really like AD. Too bad we can't restructure his contract.
Joined
·
40,250 Posts
I had my fill of Van Horn when he was with Philly last year. He is constantly traded for a reason, in spite of what appear to be solid stats....he sucks. Plain and simple.
Miles...He knows less than ERob about how to play basketball. Significantly less. The Bulls don't have the patience to get the best out of Miles. So, no.
Wallace: Yes. He's one of the most gifted players in the league. Plain and Simple.
I don't think we have anything that New York or Cleveland wants. Cleveland wants to bring in low salaried hard working veterans. Our hard working veterans are fairly high salaried. I think Miles will probably be a throwin in some major trade involving Z.
Miles...He knows less than ERob about how to play basketball. Significantly less. The Bulls don't have the patience to get the best out of Miles. So, no.
Wallace: Yes. He's one of the most gifted players in the league. Plain and Simple.
I don't think we have anything that New York or Cleveland wants. Cleveland wants to bring in low salaried hard working veterans. Our hard working veterans are fairly high salaried. I think Miles will probably be a throwin in some major trade involving Z.
Joined
·
8,947 Posts
Joined
·
8,947 Posts
KVH avg. 7.4 boards a game from the 3 spot thats probably only behind marion for small forwards ...he cant be that afraid of contact...and seein as its from a spot that generally doesn't give much rebounding its made up
for instance ad and lets say erob dont rebound as well as the duo of KVH and curry
so van horn along with whoever is at the 4 can make curry's flaws as a robounder even less important
and in the scheme of things davis is only supposed to be playing 20 minutes a game whereas you can play van horn 35 min. at the 3
KVH is more useful , he's younger and he fills the bulls needs as a shooter from the outside plus his contract is the equal of davis so no one else has to go for the deal to work
1 - 20 of 27 Posts
Join the discussion
