[hunterb14]

1. Lakers- Shaq and Kobe enough said
2. Kings - almost beat the champs last year
3. Mavs- will be awesome this year with Dirk, Finley and Nash
4. Nets- Kidd and Martin(getting better every year)
5. Spurs- twin towers can still play together

 

[ATLien]

My rankings are the same as yours.

1. Lakers
2. Kings
3. Mavs
4. Nets
5. Spurs

 

[w-h-i-t-e-b-o-y]

1. lakeshow-Shaq, Kobe nuff said.
2. Kings- Balanced everything
3. Mavs- High powered offense, no D but who cares enough scoring will win games
4. Spurs- Duncan and the Admiral(when healthy) and a good role players
5.Celtics- C's up 2-1 and Pierce at the line to take the game into ot and maybe the C's up 3-1 and then the series is most likely over. But he missed and the rest is history. C's better than the Nets barely(even after the Vin B trade)

 

[Punisher MC]

1.Lakers-Shaq that's why.
2.Kings-The best starting 5 in the league.
3.Hornets-An experience team with depht.
4.Mavs-Can out run any team.
5.Clipps-Their starting 5 only comes second to the Kings.

 

[Chops]

1. Kings
2. Lakers
3. Mavs
4. Spurs
5. Blazers

All of these teams would have beaten the Nets in the Finals....

 

[Wilt_The_Stilt]

1. Lakers-defending champs, still have all the main pieces.
2. Kings-would have won the title if they had beat Lakers
3. Spurs-not as fun to watch as Mavs-but still a slightly better team.
4. Mavs-if they played better defense they would be #2
5. Blazers-still better than the eastern teams

 

[JoeF]

Originally posted by <b>Punisher MC</b>!
1.Lakers-Shaq that's why.
2.Kings-The best starting 5 in the league.
3.Hornets-An experience team with depht.
4.Mavs-Can out run any team.
5.Clipps-Their starting 5 only comes second to the Kings.

Let's see if LAC can make the playoffs before we put them in the top 5. I see them fighting for a playoff spot not a championship.

Mine
1. Sacramento - Should have been last year
2. Lakers
3. SA - have won a title. If Robinson (unlikely) is healthy can put up better fight against LA.
4. NJ
5. Dallas

 

[2010Illini]

1. Mavs, wait and see
2. Lakers, Shaq
3. Kings
4. Spurs, all-around great team
5. Celts

 

[HEATLUNATIC]

1. Nuggets
2. Bulls
3. Warriors
4. Grizz
5. Cavs

 

[SikHandlez24]

1. Los Angeles Lakers:yes:
2. Sacramento Kings
3. Dallas Mavericks
4. Boston Celtics
5. New Orlean Hornets

 

[Wiggum]

1st: Los Angeles Lakers (it's really a toss up between them and the Kings but the Lakers won the title so I'll give them 1st...for now )
2nd: Sacramento Kings
3rd: Dallas Mavericks
4th: San Antonio Spurs
5th: Portland Trailblazers

 

[RollWithEm]

1 Sacramento Kings (won the western conference finals in 6 in my eyes)
2 LA Lakers (I can't tell you how many times in a tight game I say out loud, "What? Kobe is that good?"
3 San Antonio Spurs (If they stay healthy, they would shut down the Mavs.)
4 Dallas Mavericks (Rashard Lewis would not change this ranking one way or the other.)
5 New Orleans Hornets (oh so balanced)

 

[hunterb14]

Originally posted by <b>HEATLUNATIC</b>!
1. Nuggets
2. Bulls
3. Warriors
4. Grizz
5. Cavs

Those must be the worst teams in your opinion. There is no way they are the best teams in the league.

 

[SLiM9287]

1.Lakers-shaq+kobe=championship
2.Kings-if bibby resigns we will see a rematch next year of WCF
3.Spurs-Tim duncan best fundemantals and great team leader
4.Mavs-Dirk,Finley-Nash-Lafrants on paper is a championship
5.Nets- Leader Kidd and may do again next year


Can I ask how u ppl put the kings ahead of the lakers?

 

[Chops]

Originally posted by <b>KBStAt</b>!
Can I ask how u ppl put the kings ahead of the lakers?

Simple, they are a better team....

 

[Damian Necronamous]

Originally posted by <b>KC</b>!
1. Kings
2. Lakers
3. Mavs
4. Spurs
5. Blazers

All of these teams would have beaten the Nets in the Finals....

The Lakers 3 peat but it's still not enough for the Laker haters eh?:no:

 

[k^2]

Originally posted by <b>hunterb14</b>!


Those must be the worst teams in your opinion. There is no way they are the best teams in the league.

man please tell me you've heard of sarcasm before...

 

[jazzy1]

The Kings are a better team based on what Horse shoes or is it the close but no cigar pole,

1. Lakers Of course
2.Jersey Finals runner up
3.SAC TOWN whining cow bellers(if kobe wasn't sick bellers get broom)
4. Spurs probably would've beat the Cow bellers
5. Mavs should have been swept by the bellers

 

[Chops]

Originally posted by <b>The X Factor</b>!


The Lakers 3 peat but it's still not enough for the Laker haters eh?:no:

Hmmm. No.

By the way, stop deleting my posts. I am answering his question. Less is more.

 

[Chops]

Originally posted by <b>jazzy1</b>!
The Kings are a better team based on what Horse shoes or is it the close but no cigar pole,

1. Lakers Of course
2.Jersey Finals runner up
3.SAC TOWN whining cow bellers(if kobe wasn't sick bellers get broom)
4. Spurs probably would've beat the Cow bellers
5. Mavs should have been swept by the bellers

How can you put the Nets in front of the Kings? Don't let your hatred cloud your judgment....