He means what other team, like Bulls (Gordon, Deng, etc etc) or whomever... Not which player from the Nets.eastwicknets said:none trading for kg is retarded, we would get more holes than we already have if trade for kg we would prolly lose 2 starters and the bench the big 4+future decent pf+bench>just a big three consisting of kg,kidd and rj
Theres no way you can get Garnett without giving up so much or at least enough.Net2 said:Some people on this forum think we would be giving up too much for KG according to Insider.
Well, what better package could you put together so we could get KG without giving up so much?
Oh in That case. We can put a better package for KG than Knicks for sure, But a deal involving Gordon and Deng is hard to match IMO.Petey said:He means what other team, like Bulls (Gordon, Deng, etc etc) or whomever... Not which player from the Nets.
Indiana could certainly put together a better package.R-Star said:Indy could put a package together including JO, who IMO is worth more than RJ.
Didnt hear it until today, but I guess they are in some rumors too. Then again, what team isnt?