Professional and College Basketball Forums banner

1 - 4 of 4 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,866 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
The Blazers now have 4 point-guards on the roster: Damon, Qyntel, Gill and Cook. That's probably 1 point-guard too many (especially since it puts the Blazers over the 12-man minimum).

So who's going? And what makes you feel that way?

PBF
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,001 Posts
Qyntel's simply not a PG. I think that it's strange the way that the Blazers have added 2 PGs the last couple of days, but there's no pressing need to move any of them... 3 PGs on a roster is more common than 1 PG, which we've been at for some time.

Ed O.
 

·
Schilster Supreme
Joined
·
13,610 Posts
Something I found curious, no biggie, but curious. The said Gill will play behind Cook, but the didn't say at what capacity Cook would be playing. It's not unusuall for a team to have 3 PG's on their roster. Qyntel can now reserve himself to the 2/3 which I think is better for Q.

All in all the end result isn't that weird, just the way they got there is odd.
 
1 - 4 of 4 Posts
Top