Joined
·
36,817 Posts
I can understand criticism of Pax if he is initiating talking ish about a player or ex-player. I think he did too much of that after the Eddy trade, for instance.
But I see nothing wrong with a GM responding to a question directed to him about disparaging comments made by an ex-player about a franchise, the way the player was treated and so on.
But I see nothing wrong with a GM responding to a question directed to him about disparaging comments made by an ex-player about a franchise, the way the player was treated and so on.
