He is old-not athletic, overpaid, and selfish, he wouldnt fit into the offense.Originally posted by <b>The OUTLAW</b>!
Okay, I do think however that the teams chasing the Lakers have gotten better. Lamond makes about 4 mil a year. And, Lamond is better than all of the small forwards that you have at present. IMO
I guess I was wrong about the old part..I thought he was older..but still we have T. Murray who is also a very good shooter,and by selfish I meant more of him being a locker-room cancer.Originally posted by <b>The OUTLAW</b>!
While he may not be a good fit. He is only 29 years old. While he's not as athletic as some of the small forwards in the league he's more athletic than quite a few and has a better shot than the vast majority. He only took 13.9 shots per game with the Cavaliers, that is not selfish! He also averaged 2.2 apg.
Just for the record: I hate Rider!...anyway, I am sure we would do fine with Murray-but we already have players who can do what he can,and they are not as expensive.Originally posted by <b>The OUTLAW</b>!
I don't think so, right now he's just tired of losing
Hey you all had Isaiah Rider the king of lockerroom cancers and you still one. If you can get by with him you can get by with anyone. And, he added nothing on the floor.
Originally posted by <b>The OUTLAW</b>!
I'm pretty sure that the Cavaliers would let him go pretty cheaply